Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark" Results 961 - 980 of 1,912
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
 Fortunately this isn't a matter of general public importance ...] [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:24 am by Lindsay Griffiths
  A Clearly Descriptive Engineering Trademark from Clark Wilson LLP: Larry Munn reviews the Federal Court of Canada's recent decision to dismiss an appeal in the case of Continental Teves AG & Co v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:40 am by Giles Peaker
Following Regalgrand Limited v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:40 am by Giles Peaker
Following Regalgrand Limited v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am by Amy Howe
At ACSblog, Alexander Wohl – the author of a book on Justice Tom Clark and his son, Ramsey – observes the fiftieth anniversary of what he describes as “one of the Court’s most significant modern decisions reaffirming a different principle of individual liberty – government neutrality in matters of religion”:  the Court’s decision (authored by Justice Clark) in Schempp v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am by Raj Desai, Matrix
(ii)              The narrow vires ground Previously, in the case of Alvi v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2208, the Supreme Court had held that if a matter fell within the scope of s 3(2) of the 1971 Act, it must be regulated in the Immigration Rules and could not be validly regulated by other means, such as by the Secretary of State’s policy. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm by Venkat
Clark County School Dist.Court Rejects Challenge to Indictment Over Facebook Threats -- US v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:35 am by Lorene Park
If an employee was authorized to access a server, any data accessed was with authorization no matter how it was used. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Consequently, those decisions are not at odds with the position taken by the dissent in Matter of Hahn v Rychling. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:31 am by Stephen Bilkis
Consequently, those decisions are not at odds with the position taken by the dissent in Matter of Hahn v Rychling. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
The judgefound that Juliano’s second tweet could not survive the motion to dismiss because it is obscene as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Again http://t.co/y0unOiUO3M -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-07-06: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-28: Com… http://t.co/68wn0271oo -> Crass and Offensive Tweets by Student May not Justify Suspension — Rosario v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]