Search for: "Matter of Morrison" Results 961 - 980 of 1,435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2011, 8:11 am by Neil Siegel, guest-blogging
  For example, a collective action approach justifies the commerce power holdings in Lopez and Morrison and reconciles them with the holdings in Wickard and Raich. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 12:16 pm by James Hamilton
In an amicus brief filed in what SIFMA and the Chamber called a critical challenge to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Morrison v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm by Robert Schapiro
Morrison (2000), the Supreme Court struck down congressional statutes that regulated noneconomic conduct – guns in schools and violence against women. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:32 am by Jordan Furlong
They are: Aliunde LLC: Expedited RFPs for Legal Matters Clearspire: Reengineered Law Practice Delegatus Inc.: Reinventing Legal Services Fenwick & West LLP: FLEX by Fenwick First to File: Electronic File Room Littler Mendelson: CaseSmart Goodwin Procter LLP: Founder’s Workbench Harrison Pensa: PolicyTool Morrison & Foerster: FrankNDodd Neulexa: Global Collaboration Sidley Austin LLP: Voices of Sidley Siskinds: Facebook Awareness Campaign Schopf & Weiss:… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:01 am by Jamison Koehler
  There are also separate procedures/organizations for the East of the River Community Court matters handled out of Room 221 in D.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:48 am by Robert A Levy
As Virginia federal judge Henry Hudson put it, “the subject matter must be economic in nature and affect interstate commerce, and … must involve activity. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
Daniels, citing the Second Circuit’s opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:22 am
Bill Staar is a partner in the Boston office of Morrison Mahoney LLP. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:03 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
Kyla Chin, who joined the firm from Morrison amp; Foerster, said the partners wanted to get established first. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
  With preemption analysis perhaps more than anything else on the Supreme Court docket, text matters. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:45 am by Broc Romanek
If someone out there knows if this is a distinction that matters, please fill me in. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The court observed that Morrison did not involve or consider section 17(a), none of the parties had cited any cases applying Morrison to section 17(a), and the court was not aware of any such case. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The court observed that Morrison did not involve or consider section 17(a), none of the parties had cited any cases applying Morrison to section 17(a), and the court was not aware of any such case. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm by Randy Barnett
The mandate and its penalty are not conditioned on the failure to pay for health care services, or, for that matter, conditioned on the consumption of health care. [read post]