Search for: "McDonald v. McDonald"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2012, 12:10 pm
McDonalds Restaurants where the plaintiff was severely burned and injured when coffee from McDonald's was spilled in her lap. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:37 am
The Second Amendment case is out: Erin: Alito announces McDonald v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm
[Time] Rest of the Economist article is of interest too, especially on ADA filing mills in Florida and elsewhere; In Sheehan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:13 am
” [James Taranto] Tags: AAJ, banks, constitutional law, harassment law, hot coffee, international law, mortgages, New Jersey, North Carolina, traffic laws, workers' compensation Related posts February 15 roundup (4) August 31 roundup (1) Yet another McDonald’s coffee style lawsuit (5) Worker’s comp: trauma over visitor’s remark (0) Urban legends and Stella Liebeck and the McDonald’s coffee case (23) [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:01 am
For example, the group cites the Massachusetts law (93A), but the recent case Rule v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:57 am
Carrier can be applied retroactively; McDonald v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 8:39 am
SECOND AMENDMENT UPDATE: Supreme Court grants cert. in Chicago case. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
And Justice McDonald helpfully explains why.I'm on board with that, I guess. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:30 am
This famous case from 1994 was Liebeck v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:11 am
” McDonald v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am
Plaintiff’s breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract claims were properly dismissed as duplicative of the legal malpractice claim (see Courtney v McDonald, 176 AD3d 645, 646 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:53 pm
Recent Federal Court jurisprudence The recent decision of Justice Lee in Elliott-Carde v McDonald’s Australia Limited (Stay Application) [2023] FCA 1210 (McDonald’s) and his Honour’s comments in Transport Workers Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited (NSD1309/2020) have clarified that proceedings under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Fair Work Act) do not preclude class action proceedings under Part IVA of the Federal Court… [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]
16 May 2016, 1:00 am
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:00 am
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:38 pm
The film looks in depth at the infamous Liebeck v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:11 pm
Tags: criminals who sue, United Kingdom, workplace Related posts £204.53 dispute, £350,000 cost of defense (0) Update on Ogborn v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:07 pm
[Capital-Journal via Lowering the Bar] Tags: contracts, criminals who sue, Kansas Related posts Update on Ogborn v. [read post]
