Search for: "Mounts v. United States" Results 961 - 980 of 1,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Indeed, in both states a succession of Republican governors in recent years had meant that the high courts of the state were not totally dominated by Democratic appointees. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
First, the administration contends that the United States is in a state of armed conflict with Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:40 am by Wells Bennett
Even the non-terrorism Supreme Court case Steve cites as evidence of a greater judicial willingness to confer constitutional protections on non-citizens in the United States—Zadvydas v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
Several officers, including some mounted units, attempted to quell the crowd. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
Several officers, including some mounted units, attempted to quell the crowd. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
This article is mostly about federal courts, because reviewing just what they do is daunting enough; but I occasionally cite relevant state cases, since many state courts seem to take an approach similar to that of the federal courts. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
  Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango)   Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46)   Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:47 am
The 20 December 2005 judgment of Judge John Jones in Kitzmiller v. [read post]
" The claim that the 7 ½-foot tall high-power microwave device — dubbed the "Pain Ray" by the media — will cause no injury is highly dubious, to say the least: There is good evidence from the United States military that it is capable of inflicting not only intolerable pain, but death. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:30 pm
And Judge Kaplan concludes with the following passage from Berger v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 2:33 am
The “narrative” describes Lakhdar Boumediene and the four other Algerians, all of whom were captured in Bosnia, as being either members of the Al-Qaeda terrorist network or being associated with Al-Qaeda “and other suspected terrorists” in activities “against the United States and its allies. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:03 am by Lyle Denniston
United States almost certainly will make that scheme work more reliably to track the movement of guns across the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:32 am by Stewart Baker
It’s not hard to find support for that view if you compare United States v. [read post]