Search for: "New Doe Child #1 v. United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
The new program violated federal law, causing Texas to lose $9 in federal money for every $1 of state money spent. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
Good question, they are hard to find after the new codification of the Utah Code that occurred around 4 years ago, but they start in 78B-5-501, Utah State Code. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
Hale, 1 Wall. 223, 233 (1864); Armstrong v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:58 am
Defendant contends that requiring him to testify before the grand jury pursuant to the subpoena issued by the government would violate his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination under the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 6:44 pm
The United States does not recognize the PLO or PA as a sovereign state, and both are barred from operating in the United States, except for at the United Nations. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:02 am
” United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm
Immigration Law Case: United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
In 2005, Husband closed a successful business in New York State and relocated to South Carolina to advance Wife’s career with United States Customs and Border Protection. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Petitioner Bostock worked for the Clayton County Juvenile Court System as a child welfare services coordinator. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
., attorneys for amicus curiae New York State United Teachers, Christina M. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 5:01 am
[1.] [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
(Communication, para 4.1)It can be seen that the Communication does not stop with policing content. [read post]
