Search for: "Office of Staff Attorneys for the United States Court of Appeals"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2013, 9:31 am
Indiano & Williams also features a respected appellate practice before the First Circuit Court of Appeals and the appellate courts of Puerto Rico. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
” The circuit judges followed with a ruling two weeks ago in the securities fraud case of United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Chen has been confirmed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
” Other Fundamental Problems With Shepard’s False Accusations What prompted me to look at Shepard’s work was a long note from an attorney friend who is a former federal prosecutor, and now active as a criminal defense attorney in both federal and state courts. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:28 am
Tavera's motion for a new trial based on the Brady failure was still pending when the Sixth Circuit decided, in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:31 pm
From 1996 to 1998, Chen served as a Technical Assistant at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, performing the functions of a staff attorney. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:13 am
Native American tribes have a treaty, trust and special relationship with the United States. [read post]
U.S. Government Getting Password Information? (And Why the Story Raises More Questions Than Answers)
26 Jul 2013, 11:43 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:14 pm
In the published portion of a recent opinion affirming a trial court’s judgment, which denied a writ petition challenging an EIR, the First District Court of Appeal, Division 3, applied the relevant legal framework of the Supreme Court’s decision in Save Tara v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Commentary: this case is a worthy reminder to agency staff that “best practices” dictate that what agency staff states publically and in writing, including emails, needs to be carefully considered for its CEQA implications. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
The Court of Appeal denied the County’s writ petition. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:40 am
Yesterday the Digital Media Law Project, with help from the Cyberlaw Clinic, filed an amicus brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:25 pm
The Appellate Division dismissed her appeal and Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals was denied. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm
But some people want the Federal Circuit to destroy intellectual property with a hammer only to deprive itself and all other courts in the United States of the opportunity to decide on interoperability based on what happens to an API after its creation and on what a defendant wants to do with it and to it.The EFF's submissions are, of course, consistent with Google's appellate brief, which even argued that intellectual property protection can be lost over time, mentioning… [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:58 am
If people get sick, we allow them, even encourage them, to go to court and sue for compensation. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:34 pm
The leading authority on point is a 1978 case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, raised in the context of exporting blueprints for missile cases. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:00 am
David Brown is an attorney of Commercial Collections located in the Cleveland office of Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA (WWR) who can be reached at 216.685.1062 and dbrown@weltman.com. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit would later describe the mistake, "Time's article, therefore, erroneously identified Schafer, then working in his family's janitorial business in Austell, Georgia, both as a traitor to the United States government and a player in the bombing of Pan Am 103." [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
Hamer, No. 114496, a direct appeal from the Cook County Circuit Court of that Court’s order granting summary judgment and striking down the state internet “click-through” tax law as a violation of the Commerce Clause. [read post]
