Search for: "PENN v. STATE" Results 961 - 980 of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:58 am by fjhinojosa
Cumming, The Feud is Getting Old: Why The Oil And Gas Industry Should Lobby For the Federal Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 125 Penn St. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
A Debate Over the Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis September 26 – September 27 With its opinion last year in Michigan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
  State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm by Mikaela Wells
In a comment in Dickinson Law Review, Natasha Rappazzo of Penn State Dickinson Law argues that vague language in state abortion bans is preempted by EMTALA. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm by axd10
Internationalism and Where United States Courts Should Find International Law. 24 Penn St. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
That development is important not merely for its internal effects but for what it might offer to other states as a model of legitimating constitutionalism (and the construction of constitutional states) that  varies in fundamental respects from the forms and expression of constitutionalism and the construction of constitutional states in the West. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
The Error 404 Transparency Not Found Award: FOIAonline The Literary Judicial Thrashing of the Year Award: Pennridge, Penn., School District The Photographic Recall Award: Los Angeles Police Department The Cops Anonymous Award: Chesterfield County Police Department, Va. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:19 am
" The Court held open the possibility of "eccentric cases" in which the employee makes clear his approval of the conduct in conveying the information (for example, describing a racist joke as hilarious probably wouldn't count as opposing the joke-telling).January 26, 2009 decision hereSCOTUS docket hereSCOTUSwiki here14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]