Search for: "PER-CO LTD"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
; Commercial success as criterion of inventive step: Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & co. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
Brown v Stott [2003] 1 AC 681, per Lord Steyn). [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
Julia Hörnle, Professor of Internet Law, CCLS, Queen Mary University of London[1] It is now well known that internet users are widely tracked and profiled by a range of actors and the advancements in data science mean that such tracking and profiling is increasingly commercially profitable[2]. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
IPKat Jeremy Phillips walks us through the laborious court dealings of the Star Wars copyright litigation brought by Lucasfilm Ltd, Star Wars Production Ltd and Lucasfilm Entertainment Co Ltd against the evil empire consisting of the man who produced military uniforms for the Star Wars movie and the company he owned. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
Bongiovanni, who were appointed co-executors of the estate. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Shareholders were represented by co-lead counsel firms Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll. 2.) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
To the extent that YMCA implies that its reputation will be damaged absent restriction, see id. at 3-4 (describing plaintiff's complaint as containing "baseless, per se defamatory, tangential, and extremely prejudicial accusations" and "ad hominem attacks … which are prejudicial or, in part, defamatory in nature"), YMCA does not identify a "clearly defined and serious injury" that would result if access is not restricted. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:36 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court (Lexis Holdings International Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
Written by our friends at Kilpatrick Stockton, E. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down Under) Design… [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
Surveillance The UK’s Health Security Agency has been using video surveillance technology from the controversial Chinese firm Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 7:35 am
In the past few years, two federal government interagency committees—the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and Team Telecom—have begun to play an important role in the government’s effort to counter potential threats from Chinese companies’ involvement in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Gerald Godoy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:37 pm
Six months later, Husch Blackwell merged with Welsh & Katz, Ltd, a 45-lawyer Chicago-based intellectual property firm where Gene D’Aversa worked as Director of IT. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
Allstate Insurance Co., 341 F. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
In Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
