Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW" Results 961 - 980 of 4,985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2007, 7:29 am
The following commentary is by Goodwin Liu, a law professor at UC Berkeley specializing in constitutional law, education policy, and the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 5:57 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Big Law Business] * Sigfredo Garcia, the suspected shooter in the murder of Florida State law professor Dan Markel, was supposed to be tried on November 14, but his trial date was pushed back to December 6. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 3:51 am by Mitra Sharafi
The latest issue of the American Journal of Legal History features a forum on the interpretation of the Second Amendment. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 1:30 pm by Thalia Kruger
The second post, Business and Human Rights Litigation and Private International Law, highlights findings shared by panellists on sustainability and private international law, and human-rights-related torts in the private international law of the European Union. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 8:57 am
Brandt Goldstein (Moderator), Visiting Associate Professor of Law, New York Law School. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:06 am by Amanda Rice
” In the second post in a series titled “Our Tech-Savvy Supreme Court,” the WSJ Law Blog’s Ashby Jones discusses Justice Breyer’s comments about Facebook, which Kali covered in yesterday’s round-up. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 12:58 pm
  During the 2004-05 academic year, the Law School had three visiting African American professors in residence. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm by Big Tent Democrat
My second question was directed at some misinformation on the subject disseminated last night on Keith Olbermann's show by Professor Jonathan Turley: OLBERMANN: What is the? [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 1:21 pm by Evan Lee
Barr, strongly championing Second Amendment rights, as her most significant opinion. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" The platforms challenged the law on First Amendment grounds in NetChoice v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:03 pm
Second, it amends the text of Rule 26(a)(2)(B) to link the disclosures in the expert report to "the facts or data" considered by the expert instead of "the data or other information" considered by the expert. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am by am33013w
The following article, written by student reporters, is part of a series of reflections from the Climate Constitutionalism Conference, hosted by Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University and Widener University Delaware Law School, and co-chaired by Distinguished Professor Katy Kuh (Haub Law) and Distinguished Professor James R. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:07 pm by Elizabeth Dale
As best I can tell, and I have not exhaustively reviewed the first and second year curriculum for most law schools, a number of law schools no longer require Constitutional Law I. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:07 pm by Elizabeth Dale
As best I can tell, and I have not exhaustively reviewed the first and second year curriculum for most law schools, a number of law schools no longer require Constitutional Law I. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:23 am by David Kopel
The Duke and Wyoming Centers are both committed to developing to developing the Second Amendment (and arms law in general) as a field of scholarly study. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:48 am
Professor Yu argues that maybe the only exception to this might be article 165 New Zealand-China FTA, which focuses on the protection of genetic resources, traditional knowledge, and folklore, as an anticipation of the amendments in China's Patent Law. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
That is, how flagrant was the Fourth Amendment violation? [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:30 am by Adam Gillette
Keep up the good work.With respect to Professor Lee's two bullet points, the second one seems spot-on and I considered making that point in the original post. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Conversely, where understandings of rights narrowed between 1791 and 1868, the opposite would be true.The majority and concurrence in Bruen say they don't need to resolve the issue because the challenged New York law violates the Second Amendment as understood in 1791 and the Fourteenth Amendment's incorporation of the Second Amendment as understood in 1868. [read post]