Search for: "Pacific Legal Foundation"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,428
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2012, 3:01 am
See this post by Pacific Legal Foundation for more background. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:35 pm
F-14 (the “Fisheries Act”) in a protection statement concerning the critical habitat of the northeast pacific, northern and southern populations of killer whales. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:16 am
Missouri Pacific Railroad, further developed by the Third Circuit in El v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 11:59 pm
Brief Amicus Curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation and Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence in Support of Petitioners Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, Cato Institute, and Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute in Support of Petitioners James D. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:54 am
United States permits a court conducting a harmless-error analysis in the context of an “alternative theory” case to consider only the strength of the government’s case on the legally valid theory, without regard to whether the defendant contested that theory enough to create a factual dispute that rationally could have been resolved in the defendant’s favor; and (2) whether a court conducting a harmless-error analysis in the context of an “alternative… [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:27 pm
KimmelAmicus brief of Rent Stabilization Association of New York, Inc. et al.Amicus brief of Pacific Legal Foundation et al.Amicus brief of Atlantic Legal Foundation and Center for Constitutional JurisprudenceAmicus brief of Community Housing Improvement Program, Inc.Reply of petitioners In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Both Connerly and ACRI were permitted by the district court to intervene in the present case and were represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, a conservative/libertarian public interest litigation firm that has successfully represented proponents of Section 31 in other cases, including Coral Constr, Inc v City & County of San Francisco (CalSCt (2010); 93 EPD ¶43,961) and Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc v City of San Jose (CalSCt (2000); 76 EPD ¶46,134). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:00 pm
” Arkansas’ successful petition for certiorari was supported by a rather odd coalition that included a handful of other states and the Pacific Legal Foundation. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:40 pm
Congratulations to my friends at the Pacific Legal Foundation on the victory. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:57 pm
" Disclaimer: my Pacific Legal Foundation colleague (and fellow U. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:46 am
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Amicus brief of Pacific Legal Foundation and Cato Institute Amicus brief of State Attorneys General Amicus brief of National Association of Home Builders and the American Forest Resource Council Reply of petitioner Cases involving lawyers from Goldstein & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Moncrieffe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:33 pm
(see Pacific Legal Foundation Talking Points.) [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:00 pm
Central Puget Growth Management Hearings Board (11-457) Challenge goes to Supreme Court (Article on Pacific Legal Foundation website) Amicus brief filed by Citizens’ Alliance for Property Rights Opposition brief (Hood Canal Environmental Council, Futurewise, People for Puget Sound, Kitsap Citizens for Responsible Planning, and West Sound Conservation Council) SCOTUSBlog also informs that the court’s March 30 conference will include… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:39 am
Timothy Sandefur, Pacific Legal Foundation, has published Love and Solipsism: Law and Arbitrary Rule in Classical DramaWhat distinguishes the rule of law from the lawless, arbitrary rule of brute force — which can almost interchangeably be described as tyranny or as anarchy — is that in a lawful rule the government’s coercive power operates according to principles of generality, regularity, fairness, rationality and public-orientation, whereas the… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:44 pm
UPDATE: Timothy Sandefur of the Pacific Legal Foundation points out that at least some of the anti-mandate cases do have sympathetic plaintiffs: Prof. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Setting the foundation: climate change adaptation at the local level. 41 Envtl. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:51 pm
LINKS Pacific Legal Foundation page [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm
EPA :: Greenwire Analysis :: Pacific Legal Foundation Press Release [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:04 pm
They have no legally protected interest in anything else, the government has asserted. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm
For a more full discussion on the case, see the statement by Pacific Legal Foundation who represented the Sacketts. [read post]
