Search for: "Parallel Productions, Inc."
Results 961 - 980
of 1,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2007, 3:13 pm
Nov. 30, 2007), the Delaware Chancery Court ruled that the presentation of a Special Committee report to the full Board of Directors of Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., including individual director defendants and their counsel, waived the attorney-client privilege as to all communications between the Special Committee and its lawyers. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
Gore & Associates Inc. held to have willfully infringed rival C.R. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The parallelism isn't at all surprising, since Buckman was a Bone Screw case, and we bone screwers pioneered use of these sections in preemption litigation.Footnote 7 on page 12 of the W-L brief contains the definitive list of other similar state statutes that will be affected by the Court's ruling, whatever that ruling might be. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:36 am
Id. at 4-5, 7, 20-22.FDA PMA involves rigorous review of the adequacy of product labeling/warnings. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:29 am
For more information, visit www.storediq.com.StoredIQ is a trademark of StoredIQ, Inc. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
For all intents and purposes Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
They're only used one day a year, which means they need to be easy to move around.[26] By nature - by the very laws surrounding their reason for use - they can not be under any kind of surveillance.[27] They are technologically immature, in wide scale deployment for less than a decade.[28] As for the target consumer, few of the officials in charge of buying voting systems in the US are likely to be qualified to make purchasing decisions for large computer systems.[29] With almost two billion… [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
§314.70.Thus, under the "rule of construction" the new FDA powers conferred by §901 explicitly don't displace anything that already existed - both the arguments that defendants in prescription drug product liability litigation use to advance implied preemption, and the arguments that plaintiffs use to oppose implied preemption are preserved by the explicit terms of the "rule. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 6:43 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 9:27 am
As of September 17, 2007, Linden Research, Inc. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 3:15 am
NETFX PRO, INC. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 7:34 am
Pfizer, Inc. and Tweedy v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:10 am
Zeneca, Inc., 2005 WL 2993937, at *4 (D. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:58 pm
PepsiCo, Inc., 836 F.2d 173, 179 (3d Cir. 1988). [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 9:51 am
Kraft Canada Inc. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:51 am
This is a case which, if sustained, will allow the exclusion of parallel market products which bear registered copyrights from the Canadian marketplace. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
" Id. at *30, citing Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Medtronic, Inc., 466 F. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
" Verizon Communications Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:03 am
The parallels are quite striking when we think about them. [read post]
