Search for: "People v Court" Results 961 - 980 of 61,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The US Supreme Court announced Friday that it has granted certiorari in the case City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:48 am by Mark Graber
Conservatives who claim to hate Roe v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:29 am
Tell me it makes sense to keep pushing this one.This is already the third time the case has been back up to the California Supreme Court, not to mention the time in the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 4:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the time of defendant's trial, polygraph tests had not been proven to be reliable as held in People v Leone. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
  It may not make rational sense, but people aren't uniformly rational animals.Case in point. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:03 pm
Lena makes another tactical decision:After giving his testimony, Lena told the court and the jury he would not answer any of the People’s questions during cross-examination. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:56 pm
Especially when, like today, it's thus far a very slow day in the Ninth Circuit and California Court of Appeal. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:00 pm
Here is a brief summary of the report<http://www.citizen.org/concepcion-third-anniversary-corporate-wrongdoing-forced-arbitration-report>:“Cases That Would Have Been: Three Years After AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 5:35 am by Richard M. Re
Last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in DC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:19 am by Richard M. Re
Last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in DC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:53 pm by Caprice Roberts
As I blogged about earlier this month, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm by Brian Shiffrin
As the Court explained"Reversal [of that conviction and dismissal of the ninth count] is required because the jury may have convicted defendant of an unindicted [attempted murder], resulting in the usurpation by the prosecutor of the exclusive power of the [g]rand [j]ury to determine the charges" (People v McNab, 167 AD2d 858, 858; see People v Comfort, 31 AD3d 1110, 1111, lv denied 7 NY3d 847). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
As the Court explained,"[t]he appeal must be dismissed because no judgment or order is included in the record on appeal, and '[n]o appeal lies from a decision' (People v McCarter, 97 AD2d 852). [read post]