Search for: "People v Long"
Results 961 - 980
of 19,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 2:45 pm
The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment limits the use of out-of-court statements of people who do not testify as witnesses in the criminal trial, but exactly where that line is drawn has been a problem for a long time. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
A traditional telephone company laid physical wires to create a network connecting people. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:32 am
Anyway, here's what Luttig wrote: I understand the Supreme Court to have intended its decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:12 am
Alesi, United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
The revival of Section 502B is long overdue. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:30 am
Today, the ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Liberty University v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:20 am
It feels like Democrats owe their people an apology for being bad at their jobs - they had a long time to codify Roe v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
That has some attractions, as long as there is a system than allows others in the firm to see the chronology of a matter at a glance. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Deputy Commissioner David V. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
There, the person accused was convicted of defrauding different people than the indictment alleged he defrauded. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:40 pm
We can all agree that granting people stock options that can't lose -- as Apple and lots of other (often high-tech) outfits did Not Long Ago -- at least feels wrong. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:15 am
People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:04 am
Frey (Treaty Rights)United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Const., Amend IV (protecting “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects”).[3] The Supreme Court’s conception of privacy protections thus long focused on protecting places. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 7:02 am
" But in Church v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:50 pm
In Leetzow v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:50 pm
In Leetzow v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:02 am
There are actually a surprising number of exceptions to that rule . . . but the amended judgment in People v. [read post]
