Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 12:34 am
Recalling the national outcry to the House of Lords ruling in YL v Birmingham City Council, it is disheartening to learn that this mechanism is very little used. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
(ii) The best and only practical way to describe its smell is to inform people that it smells like X. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm
In April 2011 a Joint Committee of the Lords and Commons was set up to consider the bill. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
These peoples brought their culture and traditions, their problems and disputes as well as their means of settling disputes. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
These peoples brought their culture and traditions, their problems and disputes as well as their means of settling disputes. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am
On the Thornton issue, Lord Sumption (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hodge and Briggs concurring) said: 7. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am
The point was considered in the seminal decision of Eady J in McKennitt v Ash [2006] EMLR 10. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
Former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Tom Bingham, in his book “The Rule of Law”, while explaining the rule of fair trial cited a House of Lords’s case “Regina v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm
The panel will be Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
UK Human Rights Blog posts R (Associated Newspapers) v Lord Justice Leveson: Challenge to Anonymity Ruling Dismissed January 22, 2012 1 Crown Office Row Is the European Court of Human Rights obsessively interventionist? [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 6:10 am
Family law cases involve people, not governments and corporations, and quite often these people have children. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:26 am
Turning, then, to the House of Lords’ decision, Jacob LJ noted that Lord Hoffmann explicitly endorsed the Court of Appeal’s approach in the case. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
The core of this may be two people but, in some cultures, (such as those that recognise polygamy or polyandry) it may be more than two people. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 pm
As the House of Lords made clear in Ahmad, s.166A(3) only requires that the people encompassed within that section are given “reasonable preference”; it “does not require that they should be given absolute priority over everyone else” ([18]). [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm
But I am not convinced that, even though reasonable people may disagree on the outcome, the case necessitated a judgment of some 122 pages and 454 paragraphs (somewhere, Lord Denning is spinning in his grave). [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
” In Jonathan Aitken v the Guardian (1997 CA) Lord Bingham followed Denning: “An important consideration in favour of a jury arises where, as here, the case involves prominent figures in public life and questions of great national interest. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Lord Lucas proposes new UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 section to provide remedy for groundless copyright threats (1709 Copyright Blog) (Techdirt) US CAFC scraps point of novelty for design patents: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Inventive Step) … [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
As to the wisdom of the Defence, in both its common law and statutory incarnations; this is what Lord Hobhouse said in his speech in Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127 to the then House of Lords; “The liberty to communicate (and receive) information has a similar place in a free society but it is important always to remember that it is the communication of information not misinformation which is the subject of this liberty. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
ABKCO v. [read post]
