Search for: "People v. Ball"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 4:10 am
The bill of rights protects people from the government but does not oblige the government to furnish protection against private violence. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:09 am
In Elie v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 10:19 am
The case is Hines v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:52 am
Here's a great case decided by the California Cout of Appeal earlier today that encapsulates both a variety of policy/doctrinal choices as well as exemplifies how not-so-easy being a judge is even you're in fact a "pure umpire" who's merely "calling balls and strikes. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:21 am
At the heart of McDaniel v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 2:12 am
When he does, you get People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 2:12 am
When he does, you get People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 3:52 am
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:05 pm
There are photos of the V's fingers, cut off after the autopsy, that show the fibers in the broken nail. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:20 am
Just a couple of weeks agok, the court in Chen v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 5:36 pm
In three previous blog posts, I detailed how Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) violated Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and SEC disclosure rules by improperly deferring the recognition of an accounting error to create a cookie jar reserve to inflate future profits. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:10 am
Because even after you finish your sentence, and even after you have your balls surgically removed, we still won't let you out. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
We don't mind people saying we're full of it, we couldn't be litigators if we did, but that should be decided on the strength of our arguments, not on which side of the "v" we reside. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:01 pm
Some people will say: "But the statute is clear. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:08 am
In Ohio v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:36 pm
Some "balls and strikes. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
Some "balls and strikes. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:12 am
And (wait for it) ... segue to Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
One of the frustrated women umpires, Pam Postema, wrote a book about her mistreatment, You've Got to Have Balls to Make It in This League, a portion of which is worth quoting: Almost all of the people in the baseball community don't want anyone interrupting their little male-dominated way of life. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:09 am
I suggested that the canon should not only include super-precedents like Brown v. [read post]
