Search for: "People v. Fields"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2015, 7:56 am
That day has come.The second amicus brief is in Intellectual Ventures v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 5:14 am
Dickinson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 1:00 pm
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 4:23 am
The Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am
S v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
The judge gave a Prim instruction (Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction, Civil No. 1.05; People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 11:47 am
Young v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:27 am
In a doctrinally bankrupt decision, the Supreme Court in Michigan Dep't of State Police v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 7:23 am
In the recently decided People ex rel. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:35 am
The position of law which has consistently held the field for over a hundred years in the U.K. and for well over five decades in India, is that the business of a corporation is not the business of its shareholders. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:44 pm
Mann in 1830 and State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:52 pm
Perdue lawsuit and HB-908.Whitaker v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Whether domain expertise can safeguard against hindsight bias is not entirely clear, experts – specifically judges – are certainly not immune to hindsight bias.[3]Deliberation in groups does not seem to reliably reduce hindsight bias, but the research is limited and restricted to small groups (three people). [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 3:16 am
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
Some people are cheering and some people are shrugging in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Star Athletica v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:09 am
(People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am
In yet another decision demonstrating that a judge whose career was spent prosecuting can show the fortitude to suppress, Brooklyn Justice Mark Dwyer rejected the testimony of NYC Police Officer Robert McNamara, who falsely claimed consent to justify a search of an apartment to locate a weapon.In People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
The judge made the following comments: “The directors are intelligent, experienced and conscientious people. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
Case Citation: Elonis v. [read post]
