Search for: "People v. Mines" Results 961 - 980 of 1,929
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2015, 9:20 am
“You absolutely have to have risk management strategies to deal with people. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm by Eric Turkewitz
Rakofsky sued so many people and companies that discussed what happened that the suit was instantly dubbed Rakofsky v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
By November of 2014, more than 5,800 Supreme People’s Court’s decisionsand more than 3,553,000 local courts’ decisions can be accessed online. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:15 pm by Kim Krawiec
(HT: Lisa Milot)   Related Posts: Taxing Eggs: A Mini-Symposium Taxing Eggs: Introduction to Perez v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:08 am by SHG
When SJ was in its infancy, a post of mine was picked up at Volokh Conspiracy, which was already a well-established blog, by Ilya Somin, who wrote: Over at Simple Justice, Scott Greenfield has an astonishing post about a criminal case that deserves much wider attention: People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
“Predictions about the future might appear to be difficult, but Niels Bohr, and perhaps three other influential people, might have been astonished to learn we have been fortunate to compile a long list of rather pragmatic predictions for the legal industry in 2015. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am by Wells Bennett
  I suggest people are upset about phone tapping and data mining, because it happens to them. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:52 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in R. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:35 am by Jon Gelman
Flanking them were James Sherk, also of the Heritage Foundation, and William Messenger, the attorney from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation who argued Harris v. [read post]