Search for: "Peters, Appeal of"
Results 961 - 980
of 6,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2018, 9:35 am
This does seem wrong, but the Court of Appeal is the Court of Appeal. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
The post Update on Notice Periods in Mass Terminations appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 5:59 am
The plaintiff appealed this decision. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
The post Update on Notice Periods in Mass Terminations appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 2:42 pm
Peter Loftus' article, entitled "New Jersey Appeals Court Revives Proposed Vioxx Class-Action Suit," may be found on page C15 of the January 17, 2007 edition of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:03 am
The same contract also usually denies any right of appeal from the arbitrator’s decision. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:39 am
Fass
"Peter M. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:03 am
The same contract also usually denies any right of appeal from the arbitrator’s decision. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 2:59 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (T-T-A-B) has scheduled six (6) oral hearings for the month of November 2018. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 9:25 am
One of the gifts that patent aficionados are expecting with excitement for 2023 is a clear answer to the questions referred to the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal (“EBA”) in case T 116/18 (i.e. plausibility). [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 2:55 am
Peter v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Here are three more Section 2(d) appeals for your consideration. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:34 am
Here are three recent decisions in appeals from Section 2(d) refusals, decided on the same day. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Here are three recent appeals from Section 2(d) refusals. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:07 am
II, Serial No. 90701471 (June 10, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 2:58 am
Here are three recent decisions in appeals from Section 2(d) refusals. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 3:46 am
Here are three recent decisions in appeals from Section 2(d) refusals. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has determined. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:20 am
Having found that the mark could not be cancelled on the above grounds, the Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal considered instead that the mark lacked acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 3:49 am
‘The Presidium will completed by two judges from the Court of Appeal: Ms Rian Kalden (NL) and Ms Ingeborg Simonsson (SE) and three judges from the Court of First Instance: Ms Camille Lignieres (FR), Mr Ronny Thomas (DE) and Mr Peter Tochtermann (DE). [read post]
