Search for: "Peters v. Peters"
Results 961 - 980
of 7,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 12:20 pm
In Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 18 the High Court dismissed the appeal of Peter James Shafron, the company secretary and general counsel of James Hardie Industries Ltd (“JHIL”), against previous decisions that he contravened s 180(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by failing to discharge his duties as an officer of JHIL with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person in his position would have exercised. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 12:30 pm
Iqbal, Winter v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:23 pm
Almond In Marken v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:39 am
[1]McKinley v BC Tel [2] Jones v Tsige [3] Hart v Parrish The post Tape Recording Workplace Discussions appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:39 am
[1]McKinley v BC Tel [2] Jones v Tsige [3] Hart v Parrish The post Tape Recording Workplace Discussions appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:57 am
In a video on his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel looks at Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:44 am
At Peter A. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:44 am
At Peter A. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:01 am
The ethics (and law) of emergencies: heroic efforts to shore up medical equipment on the run, such as using 3-D printing to supply a missing ventilator valve in an Italian hospital, can run into knotty problems of IP rights [Jay Peters, The Verge] “Plaintiff recognizes that the community is in the midst of a ‘coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:20 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:55 am
That is an argument that Roper v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 9:48 am
It then looks at the recent Supreme Court decision in Gall v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:06 pm
Mulvihill* & Peter M. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 12:46 pm
Weinstein's point isn't terribly original -- money buys a good defense, even more so than fame in this case -- but at least he documented how that aphorism applies to the trial of People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
The case is Taproot Administrative Services, Inc., Petitioner-Appellant, v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:26 pm
She leaned heavily on Kashmiri v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
" (link to full Statesman-Journal article) 2) Read the September 30, 2009, State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:06 am
Sadowski v. [read post]
