Search for: "Petition of Smith"
Results 961 - 980
of 3,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
A Westlaw search revealed around 35 cases in the subject area in which Kavanaugh sat on the panel or considered a rehearing petition en banc. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:46 pm
Smith; dissent by Bates (D.D.C.)) --- A divided panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a Nevada state prisoner's counseled amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, holding that the amended petition did not relate back to the filing date of the pro se petition because the pro se petition did not expressly incorporate by reference material that the petitioner attached to the petition he filed using the district court's… [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 11:23 am
The Court granted Helsinn’s petition for certiorari to answer “[w]hether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party that is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as prior art for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:50 pm
Such petitions typically take at least several months. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Smith, (5th Cir., July 15, 2018), the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision, held that a Texas federal district court should have quashed a document discovery order directed at the Texas Conference of Catholic Bishops. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 6:03 am
One of the interrogations, which took place on March 1, 2006, was the centerpiece of the state’s ca His March 1 statements—including that Dassey cut Halbach’s throat—were featured in the Making a Murderer series and were the focus of Dassey’s recently denied petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:23 pm
Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Executive Director, Smith River, C.A. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:24 am
Smith and Murguia) --- A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit unanimously reversed the denial of a habeas corpus petition filed by an Arizona death-row prisoner, holding that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the second penalty phase of his capital proceedings when his lawyer failed to challenge the sole aggravating factor that made him eligible for the death penalty and failed to adequately investigate and present mitigating evidence in that proceeding. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 4:29 pm
The brief was also signed by Karen Blum, Alen Chen, Barry Friedman, John Preis, Joanna Schwartz, and Fred Smith. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 10:14 am
Thus, the CBM program is generally cited as Section 18 of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 1:41 pm
Fifth Circuit Judges voting to grant the petition were Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, and Elrod. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:30 pm
Sturgell and Smith v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:23 pm
State, 807 So.2d 206, 207 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citing Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:23 pm
State, 807 So.2d 206, 207 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citing Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 8:35 am
Smith & Nephew: Who Decides Obviousness: Judge or Jury? [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
Dixon July 2018 Event Calendar I’m Ed Smith, a Dixon personal injury lawyer. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:51 pm
The Question Presented in the petition was as follows: Whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor's sale of an invention to a third party that is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as prior art for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:17 am
The single question presented by Helsinn in the petition accepted by the Supreme Court read: Whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party that is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as prior art for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:17 am
The single question presented by Helsinn in the petition accepted by the Supreme Court read: Whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party that is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as prior art for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention. [read post]
