Search for: "Pounds v. United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2012, 2:00 am
Parental rights are further protected by the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:27 pm
C.N. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
The Slater v Condappa case - see above. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Al- Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 - Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” for the purpose of refusing refugee status, two applicants lose appeal. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
In 1964 the US Supreme Court as New York Times Co v Sullivan (1964) 376 U.S. 254 recognised that the First Amendment applied to state laws on defamation. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
The court relied on United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
The court relied on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:41 pm
Because getting shot by the cops — whether by tasers or guns — is just something I’ve come to expect in the United States of Amerika. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 1:46 am
Sovmots Investments Ltd v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
A discussion of the R.P. and others v United Kingdom case (see above). [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
(ETS), raised capital to grow his coin-operated payphone business by using a network of independent insurance agents to sell payphones to investors throughout the United States for $5,000 to $7,000 per phone. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:42 am
Heeb's stated results support his overarching conclusion, namely that skill predominates over chance in poker. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:39 am
The report points out (seemingly just because it is procedurally interesting and may diminish the court’s groaning case load more quickly) that in July 2012 the Court for the first time in a UK case applied its new “no significant disadvantage” criterion in declaring Heather Moor & Edgecomb Ltd v the United Kingdom inadmissible. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
[Post by Jake McGowan] United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:30 pm
United States an individual must have a “subjective expectation of privacy” in the object being searched and that expectation must be one that is recognized by society. [read post]
