Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2022, 1:33 am
Take IP Bridge v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:07 pm
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing The People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Caret v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:13 am
Shelby County, Alabama v Holder (2010) is challenging the constitutionality of section 5. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
Sebelius, by construing the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act as a tax in order to avoid the constitutional issues posed by treating it as an exercise of the commerce power.1 The Court also invoked the canon in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:26 pm
Holder. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 12:08 pm
Pacific Power & Light. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm
Eli Lilly and Company, et al., Civil Action No. 2:12-62 and Marston v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Holder, a challenge to the way in which the United States interprets immigration laws about drug infractions. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am
I don't have much to say about yesterday's Fifth Circuit decision in Defense Distributed v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:12 am
Corp. v Dual Mfg. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
Perry, et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
However, when it comes to digital property, a copyright holder has the power to control the first sale and restrict secondary sales. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:28 am
Holder, which turned back a challenge to the constitutionality of a core provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:41 pm
In FTC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
Aaron Caplan in Ellis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:22 am
Holder here. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:41 am
Bement & Sons v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
’ Helmers and Love seek to maximize scope of what is deemed opportunistic to include virtually any action an SEP holder might pursue in its legitimate attempts to obtain FRAND licensing. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:41 am
We now have Yates Energy Corporation et al v. [read post]
