Search for: "Price v. The State of Texas" Results 961 - 980 of 1,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Jason Rantanen
DC and the New Need to Eliminate Federal Patent Law Preemption of State and Local Price and Product Regulation, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 30 (Download Sarnoff.BIO.pdf) John F. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
” MARCH A federal judge temporarily blocked Texas prosecutors from enforcing current and 60-year-old state laws against organizations that help people travel out of state to have abortions. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 1:37 pm
By denying Texas residents the information that consistent optometric services were available, the Texas law interfered with truthful commercial speech. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
Given the high level of taxation on tobacco products—on average, excise taxes alone make up 40 percent of the retail price—a menthol prohibition will assuredly reduce revenues both for federal and state governments, while it is less likely that the policy will yield significant benefits in terms of smoking cessation. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:01 am
 Other group health insurance programs can be subject to medical underwriting in which BMI analysis and other factors will be used to price the coverage for the group. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
Auctions work really well to set market prices when all of the relevant bidders participate. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:45 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
Myriad Genetics, Supreme Court of the United States, June 13, 2013, No. 12–398 [3] Alice Corporation Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Everything is Bigger in Texas The court rooms of eastern Texas would not, as many may assume, have tumbleweeds blowing through the jury box. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Katelynn Catalano
A third proposal would reduce the minimum increment used to price shares and reduce maximum access fees for trades. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[24] Courts in Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia do not enforce Type II agreements and only enforce Type I agreements.[25] Other jurisdictions enforce both Type I and Type II agreements as binding. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:31 am by Florian Mueller
The defendants would like to escape her jurisdiction by means of a transfer to the Northern District of Texas, and Continental's motion for an antisuit injunction has been fully briefed (in other posts I discussed Nokia's German anti-antisuit injunction and Continental's reply brief, which mentions five German Sharp v. [read post]