Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm
As John Marshall explained in McCulloch v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am
“The Justice Department is going to use every tool we have to ensure reproductive freedom,” Garland said yesterday, adding that its lawyers would be looking at options including initiating litigation or joining private lawsuits against state abortion restrictions. [read post]
The Free Speech Trifecta: How the Court Could Fundamentally Alter Free Speech in Three Pending Cases
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Murthy v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
The justices will kick off the November argument session with Culley v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 3:43 pm
Department of Justice, he supervised complex criminal investigations involving public corruption, obstruction of justice, money laundering, bank fraud, and racketeering. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:41 pm
It is important that judges, academics, and lawyers of conscience, who still cling to our naïve belief in the majesty of our courts and the beauty of a system of justice that is focused on reaching the right result, continue to speak up for the fundamental constitutional right of American citizens to access a public justice system, with judges paid by the state and who are obligated to follow the law. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Even so, a motivated group of conservative justices could decide to engage in naked partisan politics in that case, which would (among other things) allow Chief Justice Roberts to rehabilitate himself in conservatives’ eyes, after his vote to uphold the ACA in the 2012 NFIB v. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
” One argument sure to be made by the Justice Department is that Trump’s account in a personal Twitter account, and not subject to the limitations of a public figure speaking in a public forum. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Simon LazarusIn my previous blog post, I explained why Chief Justice Roberts’ 2012 decision in NFIB v. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
Trump and Shilling v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm
The US Department of Justice is pushing forward with ongoing efforts to encrypt databases in a push to ensure adequate cybersecurity. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
[see, Law Society of Upper Canada, Equity Iniatives Department Publications]. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Hyatt, 17-1299, and Nevada Department of Wildlife v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
‘Egregious Violation of Public Policy’ Vullo’s primary allegation against the NRA, Lockton, and Chubb was that the coverage offered by the Carry Guard program was “in contravention of New York Insurance Law” and “an egregious violation of public policy designed to protect all citizens. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes explained in United States v. [read post]
