Search for: "Real v. U. S" Results 961 - 980 of 1,819
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 7:44 pm by Douglas
Recentemente várias manchetes vêm sendo veiculadas na imprensa noticiando que o “congresso livrou os planos de saúde de cobranças milionárias”. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:44 pm by Douglas
Recentemente várias manchetes vêm sendo veiculadas na imprensa noticiando que o “congresso livrou os planos de saúde de cobranças milionárias”. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
 Last week, Justice Kornreich released her 32-page decision in Zelouf International Corp. v Zelouf, 2014 NY Slip Op 51462(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Oct. 6, 2014], fixing the fair value of the 25% stock interest at $2.2 million and awarding additional “damages” of another $2.2 million on the “quasi-derivative” claims for waste and self-dealing. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  Wattaccurately states that “[u]nder the learned intermediary doctrine, however, a prescribing physician may bear all of the responsibility when a consumer is given an inadequate warning about a drug, even when a manufacturer played some role in making that warning insufficient. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:41 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Dufficy’s ruling in Matter of Kassab v Kasab, 2018 NY Slip Op 50934(U) [Sup Ct Queens County June 11, 2018], comes on the heels of a post-trial decision last year in a related case brought by Nissim in which Justice Dufficy conditionally ordered dissolution of their corporation known as Corner 160 Associates, Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 2:29 am by Marcel Pemsel
The real product, whose appearance is supposed to be protected by the RCD, may be taken into account. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:26 am by Dennis Crouch
The Fourth Circuit decision here splits from the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits, which have required veil piercing to impose liability on affiliates for Lanham Act violations in U-Haul Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm by Marie Louise
TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STERNALVEST for sternal vests (TTABlog) District Court C D California: The Mongols have their colors back (for real): U.S. v Cavozos (Property, intangible) District Court S D New York: Numb Nuts, Part II: Olaes Enter., Inc. v. [read post]