Search for: "Reed v. Mai"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
In the case of Stapas v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am
Third, the Supreme Court recently upended (or clarified, if you prefer) some First Amendment precedent in a case called Reed v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
Althaus v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am
The majority (Lords Neuberger, Toulson, Reed and Sumption) held that it was not reasonable to expect a more peremptory notice. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:07 pm
Brickman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Gov’t may never have as valid interest suppression of private speech. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:32 am
What some consider to be harmless exhibitionism may meet the statutory minimum for the crime of public indecency (see People v Reed). [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:03 pm
[v] The open justice principle is often spoken about as if it is a universal. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Mohammed & Ors v Ministry of Defence & Anor, heard 9–10 May. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby and Zubik v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am
See FTC v. 1-800 Contacts. * Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 9:36 am
Lifeway Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 11:35 am
Las razones para la selección de ese sistema son diversas y debatibles pero en síntesis, el experto en derecho constitucional, Akhil Reed Amar, señala las siguientes: (A) El federalismo: El colegio electoral fue un balance entre estados pequeños y grades; esclavistas y no esclavistas. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm
The report is here and the consultation here Lucy Reed of the Transparency Project is due to speak on transparency at a family law conference in Manchester. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Lord Reed refers to the position that EU law is the law of the land and the prerogative cannot be used to alter that. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Farrell v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
