Search for: "SEC v. Downe" Results 961 - 980 of 1,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Before we all head off for the extended Thanksgiving break—if you’re traveling, stay safe—let’s run down one last Top 10. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am by My name
The ultimate question comes down to whether a person is already carrying a trade or business. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:42 am by Peter Margulies
In 2010, the Supreme Court laid down the law on speech and material support in Holder v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting that the interplay between the Dodd-Frank whistleblower and anti-retaliation provisions was ambiguous, a federal district court in New York looked to the SEC’s interpretation of a rule, found an employee need not report his potential fraud to the SEC to obtain protection against retaliation, and denied the employer’s motion to dismiss (Rosenblum v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:29 pm
 To prevent that danger, if the SEC orders disgorgement, does it freak me out? [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:35 pm by Leslie Sammis
The originating division judge will order the case transferred to Veterans Court, Division "V," and order the case set on the next Veterans Court docket. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 4:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Mark Cuban's insider trading trial is underway at last: The insider-trading lawsuit against Mark Cuban will continue after a federal judge turned down the billionaire Dallas Mavericks owner's attempt... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
The RNs alleged that the hospitals violated Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act by agreeing to regularly exchanging compensation-related information among themselves in a manner that reduced competition among Detroit-area hospitals in the wages paid to RNs (rule of reason claim). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
The RNs alleged that the hospitals violated Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act by agreeing to regularly exchanging compensation-related information among themselves in a manner that reduced competition among Detroit-area hospitals in the wages paid to RNs (rule of reason claim). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
The RNs alleged that the hospitals violated Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act by agreeing to regularly exchanging compensation-related information among themselves in a manner that reduced competition among Detroit-area hospitals in the wages paid to RNs (rule of reason claim). [read post]