Search for: "STATE v HOLMES" Results 961 - 980 of 1,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 701 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1997) and Buenoano v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
" The term "slip ops" refers to court decisions that may or may not later be published officially in the New York State Reporter. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 6:55 am
Holmes and the Application of State Constitutional Uniformity Clauses to School Voucher Schemes, 35 Journal of Law & Education 415-459 (2006).Vincent Phillip Munoz, The Original Meaning of the Establishment Clause and the Impossibility of Its Incorporation, 8 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 585-639 (2006).Barak Medina, Enhancing Freedom of Religion Through Public Provision of Religious Services: The Israeli Experience, 39 Israel Law Review 127-157… [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 9:53 am
Lewis' book tells the story of the landmark 1964 case of New York Times v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
  Travelling around in cyberspace, and covering as much ground as Kingsley, is Katfriend Miri Frankel who, having only just penned a guest post for PatLit on the SHIELD anti-troll draft bill in the United States, popped up in quite a different area of IP with "Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Copyright Expiration Date", here. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 9:16 am by Unknown
Holmes, stating that plaintiffs can only claim prejudgment interest under Colorado's Statutory Interest statute, in cases where they have already spent money on repairs, not when they are suing for an estimate of what repairs will cost in the future. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am by Anna Christensen
” At Slate, Radley Balko discusses Skinner v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:18 am by Adam Wagner
The Mayor of London v Hall & Ors [2010] EWHC 1613 (QB) (29 June 2010) - Read judgment The Mayor of London has won a court order to evict a camp of protesters from Parliamentary Square, with the High Court stating that his response to the protest was proportionate and not a breach of the protesters’ human rights. [read post]