Search for: "STATE v. SUEING"
Results 961 - 980
of 14,930
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
Citibank, N.A., holding that state “public policy” precludes the enforcement of arbitration agreements where a class sues for “public injunctive relief” under Business and Professions Code § 17200, California’s much abused “unfair competition” statute. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:24 am
New York’s standards for defamation are very high, and are set forth in Steinhilber v. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 5:03 pm
The need to consider the value of the book as a whole, or its literary, scientific or political value, is part of the obscenity test outlined in the 1973 US Supreme Court case Miller v California. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:24 am
Right now, there is a pending suit in state court in New York raising that next question.The suit, Zervos v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm
” Clayworth v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:37 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:04 am
But the world seems to have overlooked the implications of Thomson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 11:31 am
The question before the Court in Pottawattamie County, Iowa, v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
In Locke v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Nampa Classical Academy v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:22 am
Connor, 56 Misc.2d 364, Polk v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
In State of Missouri v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:00 am
Beck v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Although the complaint lists two Defendants, Noble Roman's states that Defendant B & MP was involuntarily dissolved in 2011 and that Defendant Leslie Perdriau succeeded to its obligations. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:33 am
" Some courts had considered that phrase to mean a person could only sue in state court. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:49 am
North Dakota and United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:35 am
Last week, I blogged about the Supreme Court's opinion in Lewis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Morgan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:48 am
Defendant collection law firm argued that plaintiff did not have standing to sue under FDCPA and its Texas state law counterpart: the Texas Debt Collection Act. [read post]
