Search for: "Samuel Washington"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 7:44 am
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, said the government has shown it is likely to succeed on the merits of the case, and that it will suffer irreparable harm with any interference. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:21 am
Washington also requires a defendant to show that he was prejudiced by that inadequate assistance. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
When the court takes the bench, Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are absent. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
” At the Sentencing Law and Policy blog, Douglas Berman weighs in The Washington Post Fact Checker’s assertion that a statement about sex-offender recidivism by Justice Samuel Alito in Packingham v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:38 pm
Washington that five justices assume is correct. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am
” The decision is likely to be written by either Chief Justice John Roberts or Justice Samuel Alito, because neither justice has written an opinion from the December sitting yet. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:20 am
” Briefly: In The Washington Post’s Fact Checker column, Michelle Ye Hee Lee gives three Pinnochios to Justice Samuel Alito’s assertion in Packingham v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:38 pm
Sports Bog" of The Washington Post, Dan Steinberg has an entry that begins, "Sometimes when I'm bored, I like to imagine Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito the first time he scanned the appendix of the amicus brief the Redskins filed in the recently decided Slants trademark case. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:06 pm
Although the outcome of the case is certain to affect the enduring litigation involving the Washington Redskins trademark, the plaintiff in Tam was more sympathetic than the football team. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
Christine Haight Farley is a professor at American University Washington College of Law who teaches intellectual property law. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:24 am
In today's edition of The Washington Times, Alex Swoyer has a front page article headlined "Supreme Court ruling against censoring The Slants's name bolsters Washington Redskins trademark case. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:37 pm
In an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, the court explained that the federal government “does not dream up these marks, and it does not edit marks submitted for registration. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:16 pm
“The disparagement clause violates the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in his opinion for the court. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
Department of Justice, George Washington University Law School, and Georgetown University Law Center. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:05 pm
Roberts, Jr., and Justices Samuel A. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
” Justice Samuel Alito, in an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas, agreed with Kennedy – to a point. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:38 am
It's also relevant for a high-profile case involving the Washington Redskins, who were at risk of being stripped of their trademark, but are now likely to retain it. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:38 am
It's also relevant for a high-profile case involving the Washington Redskins, who were at risk of being stripped of their trademark, but are now likely to retain it. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 8:37 am
The Supreme Court building in Washington. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:58 am
On Monday, Justice Samuel Alito in the main opinion in the case sided with the band. [read post]
