Search for: "Smith v. State of Texas"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm
See generally Ferens v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
Read it here: Colleen V. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am
The justices also granted review on Friday in: Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm
Smith, 23-167Issues: (1) Whether Hall v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:52 pm
Marrs & Smith P’ship, 323 S.W.3d 203, 218 (Tex. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Not only that, under Texas law, there must be two qualifying studies to guard against aberrant, fluky results. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant’s defences and counterclaims granted in p [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:17 am
Whitney Smith of the Flag Research Center. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
If passed, Texas will become the sixth state to enact major privacy legislation. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Opinion issued October 13, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00562-CV ——————————— SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Appellant V. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Texas, involving alleged sex discrimination in juror selection (over the dissent of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson); six-time relist McKesson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
Duke Power Company, per that racial radical Warren Burger, found a disparate-impact cause of action under Title VII and, more recently in Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:14 am
In fact, defendants in Silva Enters. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]