Search for: "South Carolina Supreme Court" Results 961 - 980 of 4,582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2020, 9:56 am by Legal Profession Prof
The South Carolina Supreme Court has disbarred an attorney for misconduct relating to multiple bar admission issues In February 2018, Respondent submitted an application for admission to the South Carolina Bar based on an existing Uniform Bar Exam (UBE) score... [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
Sojourner (June 2020), the South Carolina Supreme Court addressed the surviving spouse status of the “Godfather of Soul” James Brown’s purported surviving spouse, Tommie Rae Brown, where Tommie had not annulled her prior marriage at the time... [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
The Episcopal Church, (SC Common Pleas, June 19, 2020), a South Carolina trial court was called upon to interpret a confusing decision by the South Carolina Supreme Court in a long-running property dispute that arose after a split in the Episcopal Church in South Carolina. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The McCabe Curwood website has a comment on the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria in the case of Defteros v Google LLC Canada CBC News had a piece “Constituents sue George Darouze for defamation”. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:38 pm
So what ECUSA and its diocese can do is once again appeal to the South Carolina Court of Appeals, and then to the state's Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:38 pm
So what ECUSA and its diocese can do is once again appeal to the South Carolina Court of Appeals, and then to the state's Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 12:10 pm by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Jonathan Eggert, an attorney with Burr Forman McNair in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, also says the Court’s decision doesn’t say the program can’t be rescinded. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 7:21 am by Legal Profession Prof
The South Carolina Supreme Court overturned a surviving spouse claim against the James Brown estate Disputes over the estate of entertainer James Brown (Brown) have persisted in the years since his untimely death on December 25, 2006. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:15 am by Josh Blackman
California has so far applied its travel ban to eleven States: Alabama, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Texas. 22. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 7:01 am by Gregory Forman
The family court required husband to keep wife on his company’s health insurance plan as a form of alimony, and Supreme Court affirmed this award. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge John Gleeson skewered Attorney General William Barr’s handling of the case, describing it as an “irregular” effort that courts would “scoff” at were the subject anyone other than an ally of Trump. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court ruled poor people accused of serious crimes were entitled to lawyers paid for by the government. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Brinna Ludwig
Supreme Court rejected a California church’s claim that the state’s COVID-19 related restrictions on religious gatherings put an unconstitutional burden on religious freedom. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Supreme Court has allowed the revised rule to take effect, the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:08 am by Jon L. Gelman
In Iowa, Nebraska and South Dakota, coronavirus cases linked to meat workers represent 18, 20, and 29 percent of the states’ total cases, respectively, according to the Environmental Working Group. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:32 am by Legal Profession Prof
The South Carolina Supreme Court has found that an attorney had failed to supervise employees in connection with a part of a massive misappropriation but declined to publicly identify the admonished attorney. [read post]
27 May 2020, 11:54 am by Zachary T. Atkins
Supreme Court precedent, the Fourth Circuit said that because CSX alleged the cap targeted railroads for worse treatment than local businesses in South Carolina, the appropriate comparison class was all other commercial and industrial taxpayers in South Carolina. [read post]