Search for: "Sparks v. Sparks" Results 961 - 980 of 1,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Feb. 12, 2008) (holding expert testimony not required to prove cause of jail ventilation system collapse because common sense was sufficient for a person to find that shaking the vent is what caused it to fall); Sparks v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 2:26 pm by Karwan Eskerie
The case has attracted significant public and Parliamentary attention, and sparked vigorous debate over whether the UK’s extradition arrangements afford adequate human rights protection. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 4:42 pm by Eric Goldman
Nov. 12, 1997), where the court insulated AOL for the offline harassment sparked by online postings. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:53 am by Adam Baker
Enterprises Ltd. v Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1994] 164 AR 399 (ABQB), affd [1997] 196 AR 124 (ABCA), revd [1999] 1 SCR 619, online: LexUM http://csc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1999/1999scr1-619/1999scr1-619.html Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Naylor Group Inc. v Ellis-Don… [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 7:44 am
* Facebook's policy on breast-feeding photos has sparked protests both online and off (1, 2, 3). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
Chief Executive Nathan Sparkes says this shows how some newspapers “are being approached to work in partnership with political factions to damage their opponents. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that one of the grants, in Janus v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The case has attracted significant public and Parliamentary attention, and sparked vigorous debate over whether the UK’s extradition arrangements afford adequate human rights protection. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
This Kat is pleased to see that this article was enriched by an interview with our very own Eleonora Rosati, whose Katpost on that topic here has sparked off so much interest in this topic in the national media and beyond.Accidents will happen. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
It was held that the work only needed to “possess more than a de minimis quantum of creativity”, and no copyright could be found in a work where “the creative spark is utterly lacking or so trivial as to be virtually non-existent. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 9:20 am
An exception is Waits v Frito Lay, 978 F. 2d 1093 (9thCir. 1992). [read post]