Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Jurors ought to be free to nullify the law when they believe it has been misapplied, and lawyers ought to be free to argue nullification, taking their case directly to the people in the jury box. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
If that ends up being the case, it won’t be for lack of theorizing. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
Liu, Ninth Circuit.pdf Liu's convictions and sentencing for criminal copyright infringement and trafficking in counterfeit labels were vacated and remanded for two reasons: (1) the jury was improperly instructed to the criminal statutes of acting "willfully" and "knowingly" at the time of the offense; (2) Liu's counsel was ineffective by failing to raise an obvious statute-of-limitation defense. 6. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 11:41 am
Speak only when instructed to do so. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 5:00 pm
Speak only when instructed to do so. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm
Above industry standards, Lilly also monitored entrance points, recorded campus entry access, required recurrent training and instruction on safeguarding Lilly confidential and trade secret information, and had restrictive guidelines and required specific authorization to publish or discuss Lilly confidential material outside the company. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:15 am
While `review of evidentiary rulings is heightened in a criminal case,’ U.S. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
And what about cases that go the other way? [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm
The jury convicted the criminal defendant on all counts. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Jury selection in death penalty cases is a time-consuming and costly undertaking. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
It is, therefore, in this context relevant and instructive to note that the ECtHR in the case of Al Khawaja and Tahery, decided on 15 December 2011, considered and expressly rejected a similar view as that put forward by the Defence in this case. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:05 pm
In every Jacksonville Criminal Defense Case, the jury is read a series of instructions right before they are sent back to deliberate. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
He was acquitted in the first trial of this matter of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, petit larceny, and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:23 pm
The instruction procedure here was so confused, and so last-minute, it earned the defense good appellate review standard despite the lack of a formal objection. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
Federal criminal lawyers and the individuals they represent have no right to be present inside the federal grand jury session considering an indictment, and under current law, federal prosecutors are not even required to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury or provide the grand jury with legal instructions. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:53 am
Federal criminal lawyers and the individuals they represent have no right to be present inside the federal grand jury session considering an indictment, and under current law, federal prosecutors are not even required to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury or provide the grand jury with legal instructions. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm
He was acquitted in the first trial of this matter of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, petit larceny, and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:55 am
In criminal cases, `[t]he jury is the property of neither a defendant nor the State. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 5:14 pm
Consequently, the Register standard, which was the basis of the jury charge in this case, informs our sufficiency analysis and conclusion that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. [read post]
