Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 961 - 980 of 13,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:53 am by Ezra Rosser
A couple of months ago, I was asked to work on an amicus brief focusing on the treaties made between the Navajo Nation and the United States with a couple of other people. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Times, (Feb. 18, 2021, 4:50 PM), https://www.latimes.com/entertainment–arts/story/2021–02–18/immigration–alien–noncitizen–language–politi cs-undocumented(last visited Oct. 23, 2021). 4 Beam, Adam, California to replace the word 'alien' from its laws, Associated Press News, (Sep. 24, 2021), https://apnews.com/article/immigration–california-race-and-ethnicity-racial-injustice-gavin-newsom(last visited Oct. 23, 2021).… [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm by Reference Staff
Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association, 443 U.S. 658 (1979) and Washington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm by Florian Mueller
In Reilly, another judge relied on Epic, and one of the very best litigators in the entire United States--Mark Perry--squared off with a "no name" attorney. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:33 pm by Florian Mueller
Once the FTC pursues a PI against Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard, it will have a hard time persuading a federal judge of its market and product category definitions.Based on the FTC's market definition, Judge Davila of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California "Court finds that—regardless of the metrics used—every one of these ratios reflect a market concentration well above what the Merger Guidelines have designated as… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by John A. Emmons
Quinta Jurecic analyzed the California State Bar’s recent disciplinary action against attorney and Trump ally John Eastman. [read post]
Code, § 66000 et seq.) and the takings clause of the United States Constitution, namely the special application of the “unconstitutional conditions doctrine” in the context of land use exactions established in Nollan v. [read post]