Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States" Results 961 - 980 of 2,776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2019, 9:10 am by Rob Cohen
By Rob Cohen On Friday, May 3, a Federal District Judge in North Carolina enjoined the Trump Administration’s effort to change the immigration policy on “unlawful presence” as it is applied to foreign students, in Guilford College et al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 1:52 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003), and Justice Breyer's opinion for the Court does not actually use the word "nasty. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 6:50 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
This issue was resolved by the United States Supreme Court in 1979 in the noteworthy case of William Orr v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:00 am by Joseph L. Hyde
Recent deaths on North Carolina roads reflect this trend. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 8:08 am by Phil Dixon
The court noted that these types of discovery lapses by the government were particularly troubling, given that “it is not a new or isolated incident from the United States Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of North Carolina. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by John Ehrett
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:03 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
(They had a head start last month, when the Court heard re-arguments in an OT2008 case, Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:22 am by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes a decision released by the United States Supreme Court on March 25, 2021. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 8:12 am by Gerald Gregory Lutkenhaus
Unfortunately, their claims were initially denied so they came to me for representation.First, I was able to get them expedited Social Security Disability hearings before administrative law judges since they had claimed disability due to active military service after October 1, 2001.Second, in Virginia and in the Fourth Circuit (which covers Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, and South Carolina) there had been a favorable ruling by the United… [read post]