Search for: "State v Blake"
Results 961 - 980
of 995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2006, 8:22 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 10:50 am
The Court noted that while the ultimate harmless error analysis in this particular case might well be affected or determined by State law, the issue whether harmless or structural error applied to a Blakely error was an issue for the Supreme Court.Citing Neder v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
United Kingdom and previously held to be correct as a matter of international law by a number of American and English judges (Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
15 Feb 2006, 8:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2005, 7:06 pm
State, 47 Md. 485; Plumbly v. [read post]
6 Oct 2005, 8:17 pm
State (Ind. [read post]
30 Jun 2005, 8:20 am
During Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
On Monday the Supreme Court decided Dodd v. [read post]
16 Jun 2005, 11:00 am
Ct. 2531 (2004), United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2005, 10:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2005, 11:07 am
At issue, then, is the continued vitality of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2005, 2:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2005, 7:53 pm
As many of you are aware of, Judge Gertner had been treating the guidelines as advisory since her post-Blakely decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2004, 9:47 am
Krebs v. [read post]
1 Dec 2004, 6:02 am
United States and Hall v. [read post]
11 Nov 2004, 6:01 am
As noted by Professor Douglas Berman at Sentencing Law & Policy here, with the opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2004, 3:22 am
And today another Blakely claim struck out in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2004, 12:56 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
As a result of Blakely v. [read post]
30 Sep 2004, 10:14 am
There are bookmarks in the PDF file, so that if the file is opened with Acrobat, a list of the included documents appears.The one document I have left out is the July 16, 2004, report of the National Center for State Courts: Blakely v. [read post]
