Search for: "State v Reed" Results 961 - 980 of 2,347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  They include Annette Gordon-Reed and Peter S. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am by Ken White
Third, the Supreme Court recently upended (or clarified, if you prefer) some First Amendment precedent in a case called Reed v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In its recent post-Tincher decision in the case of High v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The American University Law Review is proud to present its annual Federal Circuit symposium, Panel 2: TrademarksFirst Amendment Freedom of Speech and Trademarks: What Is, and What Should Be, the Relationship Between the Two? [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed bench for hand-down is Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Reed. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Oyston v Reed [2016] EWHC 1067 (QB)(Langstaff J) – damages of £30,000 were awarded for defamatory online publications. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 2:19 pm by Jonathan Niznansky
Burwell [ACLU backgrounder], which pits a coalition of states and religious organizations against the Department of Health... [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 11:35 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Las razones para la selección de ese sistema son diversas y debatibles pero en síntesis, el experto en derecho constitucional, Akhil Reed Amar, señala las siguientes: (A) El federalismo: El colegio electoral fue un balance entre estados pequeños y grades; esclavistas y no esclavistas. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Reed Stephens and Alisha Johnson look at the court’s decision in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
 There is no Parliamentary authorisation for the loss of rights in any legislation made by Parliament and, in the absence of this, the appeal should be dismissed. 14:27: Lord Reed suggests “life has moved on from the times of Dicey”. 14:23: Lord Carnworth asks a question about the ‘one-line’ bill which James Eadie QC suggested the government would introduce if it loses the appeal. 14:21: Dominic Chambers QC summarises that the outcome of the… [read post]