Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 961 - 980
of 23,969
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
The key case on this is NAACP v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:00 pm
También es citado bastante por Joaquín V. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 9:15 am
“[T]he existence of a valid business relationship (not necessarily evidenced by an enforceable contract)” City of Rock Falls v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am
I really couldn’t care less; it happens, and it happens a lot.) [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Henderson, No. 2:23-cv-00617 (D. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:50 pm
This post was authored by Richard Grimes, Jacob D. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:24 pm
That's not clear; compare Cavanaugh v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Kivett, and the New York state law in Cantero v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The PCT application names the three inventors as inventors and as applicants for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:50 pm
Sackett v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
At the hearing, the parties argued the import of the recent decision of State of Missouri v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:08 am
Suriano v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
" KME Germany GmbH v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm
Ani Creation, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
Roman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
Finesse Wireless LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Cunningham, Anna T. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Cunningham, Anna T. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 8:07 am
For those who aren’t familiar, federal diversity jurisdiction refers to a legal principle that allows civil cases involving parties from different states with more than $75,000 at stake to be heard in federal, rather than state, court. [read post]
