Search for: "State v. Bail"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2024, 5:25 pm
He is available 7 days a week to discuss your case and is standing by to take on bail reviews and motions to recall bench warrants or arrest warrants on short notice. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Internet restrictions and/or prohibition became a fixture of state probation and parole releases—and in many cases even as standard conditions of release on bail. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:28 am
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 4:57 pm
Citing Fleming v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am
State funding, by contrast, comes mostly from special fees on bail bondsmen and lawyers. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:14 am
The same kind of statutory interpretation issue arose in two of the other cases decided this week, United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
” (Here, on the defendant’s dime).United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 8:25 am
Stack v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am
At Legal Insurrection, Cody Wisniewski reluctantly predicts based on the oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:03 am
At Law.com, Tony Mauro and Carrie Levine report that the video game industry has been soliciting the support of state attorneys general in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
Immigration – SIAC – bail. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:43 am
The case was closely watched by states, civil rights groups and others because it was filed shortly after the Supreme Court raised doubts about Section 5’s constitutionality in its 2009 ruling in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:18 pm
Here is this week's offering:R. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
In Smith v Jones, the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada found the public safety exception applied on the specific facts where the defendant had a clear plan to carry out a sexually sadistic murder, and had breached conditions of his bail that were relevant to carrying out such a plan. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:24 am
This states that a recognisance for a person charged with a serious offence may be made subject to the electronic monitoring of the accused’s movements on bail. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:56 am
This states that a recognisance for a person charged with a serious offence may be made subject to the electronic monitoring of the accused's movements on bail. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:40 pm
Tomorrow, Group 62: Gordo v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:18 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the career-offender sentencing guideline is unconstitutionally vague, and Jennings v. [read post]
