Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 961 - 980 of 14,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Similarly, while the narrow holding was that the law at issue was unconstitutional because it allowed some nonconsensual recordings -- particularly, body-worn cameras by police officers -- but not others, most state laws contain the same exceptions.So for states -- including California -- with two-party consent statutes, if the opinion stands, I doubt that most of them would survive. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ has been appointed as a Judicial Commissioner of the Judicial Appointments Commission, the independent body responsible for the selection of candidates for judicial office in tribunals and courts in England and Wales. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:06 pm
  Chapter V Legal Responsibilities; Articles 53-69Provisions sketching out penalties are included (Articles 53-55; 60-65). [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:37 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
Whilst the companies in this top five list are all outside the EU, the 39 member states of the EPO still account for over 45.4% of all opt-outs when looking at the country of the first-named applicant or proprietor. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
  It is likely to be aligned with the State Secrets Law and the Counter-espionage Law. (2) Functions and Power for the Conduct of Foreign Relations; Articles 9-16.These provisions vest a "central leading body for foreign affairs" with administrative authority to maange  relevant work. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:46 am by Kirk M. Hartung
(iii) An unmodified human gene, as that gene exists in the human body. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:03 am by SHG
When the Court affirmed this in the 5-4 decision of Grutter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:57 am by Rose Hughes
According to another body of case law both the product per se and its internal composition should be excluded from the prior art (T 946/04, T 1666/16). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
In her opinion for the majority in that case, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor reaffirmed that “student body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify the use of race in university admissions,” but she warned that race-conscious admissions policies should not last forever. [read post]