Search for: "State v. Bullis" Results 961 - 980 of 1,158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Antonin Scalia had an acid tongue ("pure applesauce," "jiggery-pokery"), and he did his share of trolling as well (once responding to a law student's question about Bush v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
" This was never true, of course, as Scalia's jurisprudence boiled down to bullying and bluster. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:46 pm by Lara
Facebook is known to be pretty aggressive (some would say a bully), when it comes to its intellectual property rights. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:18 pm by Christopher Bird
However, in a bit of good news, last week the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against a patent troll, Eon-Net LP, in Eon-Net LP v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:31 am by Máiréad Enright
But in a short few years, forced marriage – and indeed the family life of South Asian Britons in particular – has become the subject of a significant regulatory web, involving aspects of family law, child law, the law of vulnerable adults, criminal law and immigration regulation (see Quila v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:52 am by SHG
  Then again, given the concerns of those who cry about bullying, defamation, inaccuracy and the wealth of other evils that show up online every 37 seconds, the answer may well not be very protective at all. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am by SHG
Thus, a petitioner is entitled to obtain the identity of prospective defendants where a petitioner has alleged facts, which state a cause of action (see Matter of Toal v Staten Is. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:35 pm by John Magyar
Another problem is the bully-factor. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:37 am by Michael Scutt
The Employment Rights (Revision of Limits) Order 2009 states that the maximum award will decrease from its current £66,200 to £65,300 for all claims where the event giving rise to the claim  occurred on or after 1st February 2010. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:52 am by Judith G. McMullen
  Gradually, the pendulum swung towards defendants’ rights, and beginning with Coy v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 5:48 am by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
Judge Sullivan then went on to question his lawyers: “Do you have any concerns that potential Brady material”—that is, exculpatory evidence material to the defendant’s guilt or innocence under Brady v. [read post]