Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 961 - 980
of 5,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2015, 1:19 pm
But yesterday's decision in Davis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
A: United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 4:16 pm
Davis v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:55 pm
Argument was held on May 10, 2011 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Liberty University, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am
The appellants’ first alternative, which involves leaving the law as stated in OBG but without a dealing requirement, would dispense with the control mechanism which the House of Lords considered to be both necessary and desirable. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:47 am
Appellant contends that the court of appeals did not address his second point of appeal as required by Davis v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:38 pm
Davis. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:48 pm
Contents: Articles THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN UNITED KINGDOM COURTS AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by Merris Amos STATE LIABILITY FOR JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN EUROPEAN UNION AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, by Arwel Davies WHY THE FRENCH DON’T LIKE THE BURQA: LAÏCITÉ, NATIONAL IDENTITY AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, by Myriam Hunter-Henin THE DUTY TO GIVE REASONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, by Jarrod Hepburn THE CONTINUING MYTH OF EURO-SCEPTICISM? [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
But Davis v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:25 am
After brushing up on some case law I came across Zadvydas v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
Davis (on which I posted earlier), I'd say that this term had been an unmitigated disaster for state spending power. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 5:31 am
State, but the COA disagreed.The state had a PR granted in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Mouat (1888) and United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:37 am
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday in Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
In Amirsaleh v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(Id. at pp. 53–54; accord, Davis v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 2:00 pm
This is in clear violation of Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1(c)(4), which states that any written or oral communication made in Ninth Circuit Mediation Program settlement discussions may not be disclosed to anyone who is not a participant in the mediation. [read post]
