Search for: "State v. Duke"
Results 961 - 980
of 2,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 11:27 am
The case is Tyson Foods Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am
”Kristin Ahlberg, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “The Foreign Relation Series and Human Rights: Documenting the Carter Administration"Carl Ashley, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “Declassifying the History of U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
NAACP and McAleenan v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:58 am
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:34 am
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:02 am
United States v Stewart, Second Circuit No. 06-5015. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
Grosz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:58 am
Dauscher As we previously reported here, on April 26, 2010, in Dukes v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:21 am
See Maloney, et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:31 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Procedural issues, such as class actions, abound (PLAC briefed punitive damages issues in Dukes). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:20 am
The petition for review, FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:37 pm
People v Dukes, 2007 NY Slip Op 03758 - Juror: "I Can Remain Impartial" Pursuant to CPL 270.35 (1), a court may not dismiss a sworn juror unless it has determined that he or she is "grossly unqualified to serve in the case. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
United States and Dean v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am
Dukes passed on June 20, 2011. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:46 pm
Professor Jerome Reichman of the Duke Law School handed me a copy of the April 2012 issue of the Minnesota Law Review (vol. 96, no. 4). [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
The Fifth Circuit did no better in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:44 am
Dukes should be allowed to proceed as a class-action lawsuit. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm
Dukes, AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:44 am
” The court quoted the state Supreme Court’s decision in Dukes v. [read post]