Search for: "State v. E. B." Results 961 - 980 of 10,075
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that at issue in this was the application of the "well-settled" defense, which defense must be established by a preponderance of the evidence. 42 U.S.C. 11603(e)(2)(B) . [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
(c) The communication furthermore announced that, should the applicant ask for a decision on the state of the file without filing further requests, amendments or comments, the application would then be refused "based on the above arguments taken in combination with the arguments provided in the summons" (see communication B, point 3).V. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am by Dave
Thanks to the virtual telegraph, I’ve had the transcript in R (Coombes) v Secretary of State for CLG and Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 (Admin) for a few days (but it still does not appear on Baili, although, I gather, is available on Westlaw and the like), but a variety of circumstances (man flu/an excellent conference/family holiday culminating in a dramatic late night trip to a&e with my eldest, who’s absolutely fine, thanks) have prevented me from… [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:52 pm by Carl Neff
The statutory right to advancement of directors and officers of a Delaware corporation under Section 145(e) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) should not be confused with indemnification rights under Sections 145(a) and (b). [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:22 pm
Patent attorney Jill Browning attended today’s Tafas v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The policy statement in Recital 14 is given effect by Article 1.5(b) which states that the E-Commerce Directive shall not apply to questions relating to information society services covered by the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Astrazeneca v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:30 pm by Patricia Salkin
Aramoni, a sand mining company that owned approximately 497 acres north of Interstate 80 in Waltham Township near Utica, Illinois, was comprised of tracts A, B, C, D and E. [read post]