Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 961 - 980
of 9,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
"] From Justice Brian Hofstadt's opinion Wednesday in Kaplan v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:34 pm
El Dorado Irrigation District (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 239 (discussed on the blog here: https://www.ceqadevelopments.com/2022/03/01/third-district-rejects-ceqa-challenges-to-el-dorado-irrigation-district-ditch-piping-project-holds-eirs-project-description-and-analysis-of-potential-hydrology-biological-resources-and-wil/), and Newtown Preservation Society v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:27 pm
Joshi replies that the court’s precedent has suggested as much in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 11:44 am
The Supreme Court’s unanimous April 2021 decision in AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am
The last part of this article will examine the litigation history of content moderation laws and the potential implications of possible Supreme Court intervention on these state laws. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
The latest filing in the Supreme Court’s biggest pending case is a perfect illustration of how not to do serious originalism.The case, Moore v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 8:02 am
The first was Jones v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm
Paragraph (c) specifically references the ongoing investigation concerning Mar-A-Lago: (c) The Special Counsel is further authorized to conduct the ongoing investigation referenced and described in the United States' Response to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, DonaldJ Trump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:47 pm
United States [Schechter Poultry], 295 U.S. 495, 537 (1935); Carter v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
” When it comes to the Mar-a-Lago investigation, the order establishes that Smith will oversee “the ongoing investigation referenced and described in the United States' Response to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, Donald J Trump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Circuit precedent, binding on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, vacatur is entirely accepted. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm
Apple asked the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas to interfere, but Judge Rodney Gilstrap declined the invitation. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Babin’s First Assistant District Attorney did not. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:42 pm
Sys. of Mo. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
”As the Supreme Court famously explained in Marbury v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 1:34 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 5:16 am
The court stated that it could not decide the merits of the underlying dispute because the lack of specific findings to the claim prevented meaningful judicial review. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:40 am
Sanofi, marking the first time that the Court has taken up patent law’s enablement requirement since enactment of the Patent Act of 1952. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 11:04 am
District Court for the Central District of California granted its motion. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 11:54 am
While the district court dismissed the action, the U.S. [read post]
