Search for: "State v. Frederick"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2007, 12:59 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAttorneys' Fees Trial Lawyer Denied Fee After Appellate Settlement; State's Policy as to Ambiguous Agreements Is Cited Fredericks v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:58 pm
Frederick Motz.In response to a pro se action, State defendants filed a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and were granted the motion to dismiss.The Court found that Davis' claims arose out of a peer review process in which defendants were engaged, and the law is clear that to the extent Davis was seeking monetary damages against defendants, all of them were entitled to absolute immunity in connection with their peer review activities.Further, to the extent Davis was… [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 2:36 pm
In Scott v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:24 am
One such case is United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 5:37 am
§ 1983 and various state-law tort claims. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
Frederick Beegle (12/21/06) Idan Filip v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 12:03 pm
Frederick v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock 1874-1932 2 v. (1942) Holmes, Oliver Wendell; Pollock, Frederick; Howe, Mark De Wolfe (Editor). [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 9:03 am
Frederick Sharer.From the official headnote:Insurance contracts - exclusion of coverage to employee operating his own vehicle - not ambiguous - not contrary to public policy - exclusion not previously discussed by Maryland court Policy provision in commercial automobile insurance policy that covers the auto of an employee while in the course of his employment, but excludes coverage to the employee if the auto is owned by the employee or a member of his family or household is not… [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
On March 19, 2007, the United States Supreme Court heard this "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case, formally known as Morse v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 10:49 am
Rehnquist (1986-2005) $215,467 9 Frederick Vinson (1946-1953) $215,156 10 John G. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 4:50 am
"As I stated in the post below, I believe that Morse did violate Frederick's constitutional rights. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:47 pm
Writing for FindLaw's Writ, Marci Hamilton discusses the oral argument before the US Supreme Court in the so-called "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case:On Monday, March 19, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Morse v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 10:00 am
Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments on March 19, 2007.Both sides agree that the First Amendment would generally protect a person’s right to carry a banner stating “BONG HiTS 4 JESUS. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:26 pm
The AP has this article on Azimi v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Lyle's comprehensive post below on today's argument in Morse v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:51 am
United States, they asked. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
Frederick Sharer.Appellant was convicted of possession with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance and possession of cocaine following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
Mooney, a Frederick Republican whose vote could swing the outcome. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:02 pm
Frederick Sharer.Chester Harris was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of automobile manslaughter and related offenses. [read post]
