Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 961 - 980 of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 3:16 pm by Tom Casagrande
The Second Circuit today revived Starbucks' Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA) claim against the mark CHARBUCKS, but affirmed a judgment, entered after a bench trial, dismissing Starbucks' federal infringement and New York state dilution claims.In Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:47 am by Tucker Chambers
The post Trademark Butter Battle: Kerrygold v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 3:49 am
This morning the General Court (GC) held that the latter is the correct approach in its decision in La Mafia Franchises v EUIPO, T-1/17.BackgroundIn 2006 an application for registration of the ‘La Mafia se sienta a la mesa’ in the Nice classes above was filed, and the trade mark was registered in 2007.In 2015 Italy filed an application with the EUIPO for a declaration that the contested mark was invalid in respect of all of the goods and services for which it… [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:22 am
United States v Arnold Decision (2006) In the NY Times story "Searching a computer", said Jennifer M. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 pm by Rumpole
Here is the decision in Graham v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:49 am by Gmlevine
The Panel noted that Complainant “is …. recognized as the owner of a family of R US marks under the United States trademark law. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm by Ronald Mann
The Monday order list included a brief notation that the Court granted the petition in France v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Milano, Tecnica Group S.p.A. v Diana S.r.l., decision No 493/2021, 25 January 2021) in a copyright infringement case – decided nearly a year ago – that Tecnica successfully brought against the maker of Chiara Ferragni-branded after ski boots. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:36 pm by Lawrence Solum
In considering the South African case of Laugh It Off Promotions CC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm by Ilya Shapiro
But they also could mark the beginning of the Supreme Court’s strike against the administrative state. [read post]