Search for: "State v. Mart" Results 961 - 980 of 2,108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2013, 6:17 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  As discussed further in Seyfarth’s Workplace Class Action Litigation blog post on Comcast, the Supreme Court reached this conclusion even though it required an examination of the merits of the case, as allowed by Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 6:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  That trend is one we hope and expect will continue, due in part to the effect of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 With that door now slammed shut, major cases will go to Federal court as Congress intended, where they will be governed by the far more rigorous Federal standards of Rule 23, as interpreted in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:36 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
We have recounted numerous efforts by the plaintiffs’ class action bar to “work around” the re-invigorated class certification requirements of Rule 23 in the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm by The Complex Litigator
Chinese Daily News, Inc. took its latest turn today, when the Ninth Circuit, on remand from the United States Supreme Court, issued the most decision in Wang v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On Rule 23(a) commonality, the opinion states: Wal-Mart is factually distinguishable from our case. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:21 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Chinese Daily News, Inc., 623 F.3d 743 (9th Cir. 2010), and remanded it “for further consideration in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]