Search for: "State v. Money" Results 961 - 980 of 20,548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
Over ambitious state agencies seek to extort money from businesses all the time by using fire first, ask question later type tactics. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 am by admin
”   Relative to the alternative, this was for the cities free money:   Free money! [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:40 am by kylew
On Monday, June 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the en banc Federal Circuit decision in Hyatt v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:27 pm by Rumpole
 And so it has come to pass that a young assistant state attorney, who frequented an aforementioned establishment,  ( one would expect in an attempt to satisfy some prurient interest, see, e.g, Miller v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm by INFORRM
In so far as the damages may have value as money they are not worth pursuing. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
 Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which held that the Missouri state constitution which provides that “no money shall be taken from the public treasury, directly or indirectly, in aid of any church,” serves to disqualify a church from participating in a state program which makes state funds available to organizations to purchase recycled tires to resurface playgrounds. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:07 pm
Guess how much it (currently) costs to be admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California? [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:07 pm
This, in short, is what happened, according to IntellSphere's Alena Menyaylova and Eugene Mazo: "We are pleased to inform you that the litigation in Intel Corporation, US v IntellSphere Group, UZ, which lasted for one and a third years, has reached a satisfactory outcome. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:53 am by Marty Lederman
As Ruthann Robson explains in her analysis for this blog, in its decision in Lane v. [read post]